BrazeAI:AI 辅助客户互动
BrazeAI 为 Braze 客户触达平台提供个性化消息能力。其替代方案部分涵盖其他客户触达与营销自动化工具,供买家整理候选名单。
- 浏览量
- 0
- 使用
- 0
- 收藏
- 0
- 编辑评分
- 78/100
BrazeAI 功能与使用流程
BrazeAI 是 Braze 客户互动平台中的 AI 能力层,用于跨邮件、Push、短信、WhatsApp、站内和网页渠道优化内容、发送时机与激励。它适合拥有实时客户数据和复杂生命周期运营的大型团队,通过决策模型为每位用户选择更合适的互动方式。
- 跨邮件、Push、短信、WhatsApp、站内和网页渠道协调消息
- 用 Decisioning Studio 优化每位用户的渠道、时间、内容和激励
- 通过自然语言辅助建立活动、生成内容并同步受众到广告平台
适合谁与使用场景
你正在让拉新、购买后或召回触达更有节奏,需要让跨邮件、Push、短信、WhatsApp、站内和网页渠道协调消息与用 Decisioning Studio 优化每位用户的渠道、时间、内容和激励在日常流程中配合起来,才有机会让一条明确的触达路径先跑顺。
优先考虑它,因为它能帮你:把跨邮件、Push、短信、WhatsApp、站内和网页渠道协调消息放进当前流程,重点是围绕具体人群和经营目标组织触达;围绕用 Decisioning Studio 优化每位用户的渠道、时间、内容和激励安排这一步,可把客户信号、内容和节奏放进同一流程;
通过自然语言辅助建立活动、生成内容并同步受众到广告平台;这样可先验证一条旅程,再决定是否扩展到更多人群或渠道。开始前要确认:采用定制报价;需按预期数据量、消息量、渠道和所选模块向销售团队询价。
BrazeAI 费用与使用条件
BrazeAI 能力通过 Braze 平台及相关产品采购。Platform Editions 与 Decisioning Studio 的产品范围不同,需要在订单中分别确认。
Braze 平台版本
| 产品或购买选项 | 适用范围 | 公开价格与状态 |
|---|---|---|
| Braze Go | 激活客户数据并启动跨渠道营销。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
| Braze Select | 管理更多渠道和团队成员。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
| Braze Pro | 使用预测 AI 与个性化推荐。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
| Braze Enterprise | 开展企业规模的客户互动。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
BrazeAI Decisioning Studio
| 产品或购买选项 | 适用范围 | 公开价格与状态 |
|---|---|---|
| Decisioning Studio Go | 利用 Braze 互动数据优化客户互动。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
| Decisioning Studio Pro | 利用第一方数据优化自定义业务目标。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
平台价格随月活跃用户数变化。Action Credits 可用于渠道及部分 BrazeAI 产品;单价、额度与 Decisioning Studio 的购买依赖需询价确认。 查看官网价格信息
BrazeAI 替代方案对比
选型先看要替换哪项工作:统一网站与 App 的多渠道消息、用邮件持续跟进客户,还是把营销和销售放在同一份客户档案里。下表说明各产品承担什么工作、团队需要接入什么数据,以及费用由什么决定。
| 产品 | 产品范围 | 适合场景与实施责任 | 价格与计费方式 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrazeAI + Braze Customer Engagement Platform当前产品 | 把邮件、短信、网站与 App 消息编排成客户旅程,并用 BrazeAI 辅助个性化与决策。 | 适合场景作为当前方案,适合需要在网站与 App 中持续跟进同一客户的团队。替换时要核对实际使用的渠道和行为触发流程,不能只比较邮件编辑器。 实施责任数据团队接入客户身份、属性和购物事件,运营再用这些记录建立受众与触达流程。更换平台时,这条数据连接也需要调整。 | 公开价格按所选 Platform Edition 向销售获取报价。 计费口径费用取决于平台版本、月活跃用户和 Action Credits 用量。Action Credits 用于消息渠道及部分 BrazeAI 产品,与活跃用户数量是不同的费用因素。 Braze 官方价格说明 |
| Iterable | 可作为客户互动平台的替代选择,覆盖邮件、短信、推送与 App 内营销活动和客户旅程。 | 适合场景适合希望继续使用专门的多渠道营销平台的团队。更换后仍要接入客户数据并配置触达流程,这项工作不会因换工具而消失。 实施责任需要按实时行为触发消息时,Iterable 官方建议通过 API(数据接口)传入事件数据。Smart Ingest 则按计划同步已有数据源,需由 Iterable 客户团队协助添加到套餐中。 | |
| Bloomreach Autonomous Marketing | Autonomous Marketing 把客户数据、营销自动化、分析与个性化结合起来。电商搜索和购物代理属于单独的产品。 | 适合场景适合希望把客户数据与营销工作放在一起管理的团队。这里比较的是营销产品,购买它不等于同时获得同厂商的搜索或购物产品。 实施责任团队接入客户记录与购物行为,再用这些数据建立人群与营销活动。所选渠道和套餐决定实际采购范围。 | 公开价格定制报价;价格页说明采用年度订阅。 计费口径费用受所选套餐、受众规模与消息容量影响。Bloomreach 支持不同计费模型,具体口径以合同为准;Loomi Marketing Agent 是单独计价的附加项。 Bloomreach 价格说明 |
| Brevo Marketing Platform | 提供邮件、自动化和按套餐开放的消息渠道。Standard 扩展自动化范围,Professional 再增加 WhatsApp、移动推送等能力。 | 适合场景适合先做邮件跟进,再按需要增加渠道的团队。入门套餐的价格并不覆盖产品功能清单中的所有渠道。 实施责任运营人员管理联系人和自动化规则。Free 与 Starter 的自动化最多覆盖 2,000 个联系人;Standard 取消这一自动化联系人限制,但仍有联系人存储档位。 | 公开价格Free 为每月 $0;Starter 每月 $9 起;Standard 每月 $18 起;Professional 每月 $499 起;Enterprise 为定制报价。 计费口径Free 每天可发 300 封邮件;Starter 与 Standard 从每月 5,000 封、存储 500 个联系人起;Professional 从每月 150,000 封起。短信和 WhatsApp 点数另购。 Brevo 官方套餐与额度 |
| HubSpot Marketing Hub | 以 CRM 客户档案为中心,承接获客、邮件跟进和营销自动化。Professional 增加范围更广的营销活动自动化与报表功能。 | 适合场景适合希望营销与销售共用客户记录、衔接跟进工作的团队。这与完整替换 Braze 所用的所有网站和 App 消息渠道是不同的采购目标。 实施责任团队维护 CRM 客户记录,并设置哪些联系人计入营销联系人额度。自动化范围、包含席位与上线服务要求取决于 Marketing Hub 套餐。 | 公开价格Professional 年付时每月 $800 起;签订年度合约但按月付款时每月 $890 起;Enterprise 每月 $3,600 起。 计费口径Professional 包含 2,000 个营销联系人、3 个 Core Seats,并另收必需的 $3,000 上线服务费;Enterprise 包含 10,000 个营销联系人、5 个 Core Seats,并另收 $7,000 上线服务费。额外联系人、席位和点数用量可能增加费用。 HubSpot Marketing Hub 官方价格 |
金额保留官网币种与付款条件。席位、活跃用户、客户档案和发送量对应不同计费口径,表中起价不能直接当作可比较的总预算。
选型建议
客户旅程已在 Braze 运行时,先评估现有 AI 权益
客户档案、行为事件和多渠道旅程已经在 Braze 运行的团队,可以先评估同一平台内的内容优化、预测和推荐。BrazeAI 在 Braze 平台内购买,应确认当前 Edition 包含哪些能力,以及哪些使用 Action Credits 或需要额外购买。能否复用现有客户资料和旅程,是与外部 AI 工具比较时的重要条件。
以 Shopify 邮件和短信为主时,比较 Klaviyo
主要把 Shopify 订单和客户行为用于邮件、短信自动化的商家,可以把 Klaviyo 作为直接比较对象。它有 Shopify 集成和受额度限制的免费入口。Braze 的采购还涉及平台版本、月活跃用户与客户档案、Action Credits 和服务;需要复杂应用与网站客户旅程时,再按这些需求比较完整平台范围。
周期性邮件决策与跨渠道需求分别确认
需要对周期性邮件逐人选择主题、发送时间和图片的团队,可以评估 Decisioning Studio Go。官方将它的适用范围定义为周期性邮件项目。若采购目标包含其他渠道或更复杂的决策,需继续确认 Decisioning Studio Pro 的具体支持范围和服务,不能仅凭 Braze 的多渠道发送能力认定 Go 覆盖全部渠道。
报价需写明 AI 模块与共享额度的购买范围
比较 BrazeAI 成本时,应使用包含平台、月活跃用户与客户档案、Action Credits 和 CX Services 的完整报价。Action Credits 可用于消息发送和部分 BrazeAI 产品,不同操作的消耗不同;另有可选 AI 产品。目标模块是否包含、用量如何换算和服务范围,应写入订单,不能从某个版本名称推断所有 AI 能力都不限量。
BrazeAI 可集成的第三方工具
Braze 的 Shopify 应用可将客户、订单及店铺行为事件传入 Braze 工作区。使用 BrazeAI 的团队可通过这项平台连接接入店铺数据;并非每个 AI 模块各有独立连接器。需安装应用并为店铺配置事件采集。
官方连接说明BrazeAI 常见问题
BrazeAI Operator 与直接面向顾客的 AI 助手有什么不同?
Operator 通过自然语言指令帮助营销人员在 Braze 内创建营销活动、Canvas 营销旅程、细分人群和内容。它主要协助营销制作与平台操作,不能按独立客服聊天机器人的用途来评估。
BrazeAI Decisioning Studio Go 和 Pro 有什么区别?
Go 使用 Braze 互动数据,优化消息、创意和发送时机等互动决策。Pro 支持更广泛的第一方数据与自定义业务目标,还可优化渠道、经济激励等选择。所需数据与优化目标决定哪种范围更合适。
BrazeAI Decisioning Studio 只能优化点击吗?
不是。Decisioning Studio Pro 支持转化、收入和客户终身价值等自定义指标;Go 则侧重互动。以收入优化为目标时,应确认产品版本和衡量方式,不能仅凭 BrazeAI 这一名称判断。
BrazeAI 决策能遵守优惠预算和联系频率限制吗?
Decisioning Studio Pro 列出了带约束的优化,例如在预算上限内选择激励,以及在退订率约束下优化发送频率。这些属于 Pro 的能力;买家应在实施方案中确认所需约束,不能默认所有 BrazeAI 产品都具备。
官方资料:AI 功能 · Decisioning Studio
参考来源
用户评论
G2 上的 Braze AI Decisioning Studio 精确产品页面。
The OfferFit team and the world-class support they provide are the best parts of using OfferFit. They truly got to know and understand how we operate our business, creating a foundation that has allowed us to grow together. Our company is not always easy to work with due to our size, but OfferFit provided the right resources from the beginning of the integration through to today, helping us establish a data pipeline with the right information to target our customers and improve NPV. In addition to continually improving and adding new insights, OfferFit makes things very easy for us, including calling out any concerns immediately and following up on issues until everything is resolved. Having worked with OfferFit for a few years now, I have long admired their company culture. It is hard to think of any downsides to OfferFit. They are so timely with insights and providing updates, they are often bringing issues to us before we have even noticed something of concern. OfferFit really helps us target our customers going well beyond the A/B method we had available to us before. The number of different offers in our bank and the ability to parse to the most micro detail the success or failure of a particular offer including the value provided is hugely insightly. Pre-OfferFit, we could only test a few campaigns at a time and didn't have the bandwidth to dig into what did or did not really work.
Engagement - The high level of engagement from the OfferFit team has been outstanding. Rolling up their sleeves and working side by side with management to build out and optimize use cases. Insights - The learnings from using OfferFit have been valuable to better understand customer preferences for different types of offers and communication medium. Value generation - The AI engine can be smartly set up to optimize value from customer offer acceptance, balancing profitability of individual offer with offer success rate, maximizing overall profitability. There are some usecases that are more challenging for AI models in general, where the feedback takes several months, slowing down the learning cycles of the model. Personalized offer selection for proactive retention efforts, and personalized price increases related to value proposition. In both scenarios OfferFit is able to deliver incremental value as the engine is optimizing down to the individual and providing automation.
Braze 客户互动平台页面;评论覆盖包含 BrazeAI 能力的完整 Braze 平台,并非仅评价 AI Decisioning Studio。
Onboarding und generell die Funktionalität und UX sind große Stärken. Es gibt eigentlich jedes gewünschte Feature und laufend neue Updates. Besondere Features sind für mich der Marketing Automation (Canvas) Builder, der sehr übersichtlich und umfängliche Möglichkeiten bietet verschieden Marketing Channels zu kombinieren. Ein kleines aber tolles Feature ist dort auch die Clean Up Funktion. Der Email Builder ist ebenfalls simpel und trotzdem funktional. Es lassen sich einfach neue Mobilansichten definieren, testen mit Inbox View oder anpassen von Größenverhältnissen. Transparenz bei der Abrechnung. Datapoints waren komplett neu und generell ist das Tool schon etwas zu teuer. Was Funktionalität angeht fällt mir aber nichts großes auf. Die Automatisierung unserer Journeys mit anderen Kontaktpunkten außerhalb von Email war für uns immer ein Problem da unterschiedliche Channels nicht nativ eingebunden waren. Jetzt können wir in einem Tool definieren, welcher User zu welchem Zeitpunkt mit welchen Nachricht und über welchen Channel sie kontaktiert werden sollen.
What I like the most about Braze is its seamless cross-channel capabilities, which allow for personalized and timely communication with customers across various platforms. While the platform offers robust analytics and reporting capabilities, navigating and interpreting the data can sometimes be challenging, requiring a steep learning curve One significant challenge Braze helps address is effectively reaching customers across multiple channels, including email, push notifications, and in-app messaging, ensuring consistent and personalized interactions regardless of the platform they prefer.
Braze setzt auf eine event-basierte Architektur, die es uns ermöglicht, Nutzerinteraktionen effizient und in Echtzeit zu verfolgen sowie darauf zu reagieren. Die Einbindung in unseren Standard-Technologie-Stack verlief reibungslos, was die Implementierung und den täglichen Einsatz von Braze wesentlich vereinfacht hat. Das Produkt Katalog Feature kann (derzeit) keine Produkt Kataloge via URL selbstständig importieren. So können wir nicht bspw. unseren Google Shopping Feed nutzen. Braze ermöglicht es uns maßgeschneiderte und relevante Experiences für unsere Kunden zu designen. So verbinden wir mit Braze verschiedene Touchpoints zu einer konsequenten Experience und reichern bestehende E-Commerce Features mit weiteren Optionen/Kommunikationskanälen an.
Braze 客户互动平台页面;评论覆盖包含 BrazeAI 能力的完整 Braze 平台,并非仅评价 AI Decisioning Studio。
What is our primary use case? At Fox, we send a lot of communication to our customers, who are also our subscribers. We have Fox One where we offer subscription-based services. We send emails, in-app messages, and push notifications about any particular show or particular sports. We also send communications regarding upcoming sport events or upcoming shows on Fox Nation and anything content-related. Additionally, we have different use cases for transactional emails. There are plenty of campaigns I have executed. I will take an example of a recent event that took place for the World Cup. We conducted many campaigns for the World Cup, including push notifications, emails, and highlights of the game. We have sent many in-app messages whenever the game was starting, such as 10 minutes or 15 minutes before the game. We deployed many push notifications using Campaigns and Canvas. What is most valuable? All campaigns I executed were done very well. Braze was instrumental in configuring and delivering communications in time with very few incidents. My experience has been great. Braze offers great features including inbuilt in-apps that do not require installation or additional packages. You can use cross channels including webhooks, Content Cards, push notifications, and in-app messages, which are great features that Braze provides. In terms of Braze features, I find it easy to coordinate campaigns across channels. I see room for more improvements regarding those features. Braze has had a positive impact on my organization that is significant. I really appreciate the platform's flexibility. Our biggest advantage is managing multiple channels from one place, whether it is email, push, in-app messages, content cards, or webhooks. I also appreciate Canvas, which allows us to build more complex, multiple-step customer journeys and trigger communication based on customer behavior. The segmentation and personalization capabilities are very useful as we can target customers based on their subscription engagement or content preferences. I find valuable the ability to test different messages and channels through A/B testing and optimize based on performance. Overall, the combination of cross-channel orchestration, real-time triggers, personalization, and experimentation makes Braze very powerful for our marketing use cases and positively fits our organization. What needs improvement? Overall, my experience with Braze has been very positive. If I had to mention areas for improvement, I would say the number of campaigns, canvas segments, and channel growth can become challenging to manage and organize. I would also like to see more flexibility around reporting and analytics, especially being able to easily combine cross-channel data and customize reports without relying on additional data from outside of Braze or data platform teams. Braze has been improving its reporting capabilities, and new reporting and dashboard features are definitely moving in the right direction. Additionally, making complex journeys easier to troubleshoot and maintain would be beneficial. When large canvases have multiple branches and conditions, having strong visibility into why a customer took a particular path would ease things for engineering and marketing teams. There is also a limitation regarding making the platform easier to manage at an enterprise scale, especially with a growing number of campaigns since Braze does not have features such as folders for organization. Regarding improvements, Braze's technical support is excellent, but I see areas where the experience could be smoother. On integration, Braze has a strong set of pre-built integrations and APIs; however, for some complex enterprise systems, integration can require engineering effort. More out-of-the-box connectors and simpler configurations would definitely help. From a UI perspective, while the platform is powerful, navigating and troubleshooting can take time with a large number of campaigns and complex canvases. Apart from that, I find the support extremely helpful overall, so I would not say there are major gaps, just opportunities for making this already strong platform easier to manage at scale. One area I would like to see improvement in is the visibility and troubleshooting experience. When running large-scale campaigns across multiple channels, more detailed end-to-end visibility on user interactions would be helpful, such as tracking when a particular user enters or exits a canvas or whether an issue occurs. I would also like to see ongoing improvements in reporting, particularly making it easier to connect campaign performance to our broader business metrics without extra engineering work. As Braze adds more AI capabilities, I see an opportunity to leverage AI not just for content creation but also for troubleshooting, identifying campaign issues, and explaining performance trends. This would save a significant amount of time for both the marketing and engineering teams. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Braze for four years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Braze is stable, and I have not experienced any downtime or reliability issues. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Braze handles growth and increased workloads well in terms of scalability. How are customer service and support? The customer support from Braze is responsive and very supportive. They provide 24/7 customer support, offering immediate answers. Each business also has their own account executive who is responsive and helpful when assistance is necessary. Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? We previously used Salesforce Marketing Cloud, but the pricing became a pain as the licensing costs significantly increased, which prompted our decision to transition to Braze. How was the initial setup? We did a trial-and-error process exclusively with Braze, and that was the only platform we tested. What about the implementation team? Braze fits into our existing marketing stack through API, SDK, and webhooks integration with our backend and data systems. We utilize customer and subscription data from our existing system to build audience segments and trigger personalized communication in Braze. Braze also supports bidirectional data movements, so engagement data can be sent back to other systems for reporting and analysis. What was our ROI? Unfortunately, I cannot provide that information due to our internal policies, but I can definitely say that Braze will yield a good return on investment. It certainly saves a lot of time and requires fewer engineers to manage things, as Braze has all the capabilities. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I was not involved in the pricing, setup cost, or licensing. Which other solutions did I evaluate? We did a trial-and-error process exclusively with Braze, and that was the only platform we tested. What other advice do I have? I would rate the customer support as an 8 out of 10. Braze's personalization and segmentation features are great. We use segments for audience segmentation, and Braze provides controls around personalization. At Fox, we have various types of subscribers with different content interests, so we do not want to send the same communication to everyone. We can segment users based on subscription engagement, content preference, and previous interactions, then personalize communication according to their attributes or behaviors. Braze supports dynamic segmentation using real-time events and user attributes, making targeting much more relevant. Segmentation and personalization are very helpful as they allow us to make communication even more relevant while providing the marketing team with substantial flexibility without requiring engineering effort for every audience change. We handle training and onboarding for new users on Braze by providing extensive documentation. Any new member on the team goes through knowledge transfer and Braze platform training. We only bring on team members who have experience using Braze. With every new release, Braze offers training on the updated features. I advise others looking into using Braze to consider it as a better option compared to other marketing tools, especially regarding pricing and cross-functional effectiveness. I would strongly suggest exploring it before making any purchase decisions. I think Braze is great, and I definitely recommend that people do their homework before making any purchase decisions. However, with the experience we have had, especially considering the complexity of projects we have handled, Braze has been incredibly helpful and has supported us in the ways we needed. I have rated this review an 8.5 out of 10. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Private Cloud If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use? Other
What is our primary use case? My main use case for Braze is as a CRM strategist and previously a CRM campaign manager, where we had a team, so it was basically just quality assuring everything, occasionally using Canvas, building out SMS journeys, and handling audiences. I built an onboarding journey using Braze that required multiple Canvas because there was a mix of email, SMS, as well as app messages that needed to be triggered at certain times and based on certain customer actions that we were able to record. What is most valuable? The best features Braze offers include being very intuitive, allowing everything to be brought in-house, which enabled us to get off a couple of different tools by having email, SMS, and app messages in one. There is great connectivity to other applications such as Twilio and Snowflake, which we had as our CDP. I really appreciated Canvas because it made app messaging really easy, whether it was an inbox message within our app, a pop-up, or a push notification. Canvas made everything easier, allowing us to integrate everything. We previously used Salesforce Marketing Cloud, which was really difficult when using app messages and making sure we could tie it all into a customer journey, so having that with Braze was excellent. Braze has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to save money. I believe we saved around $800,000 by switching from Salesforce Marketing Cloud to Braze. We were also able to see our customer journeys in an easier way, and it was easier for our producers to set up things. Liquid logic has been easier than AMPscript. What needs improvement? I did not find anything significant that needed to be improved about Braze, but perhaps making it easier to have linear journeys instead of building just three or four would be beneficial. Anything is better than Salesforce Marketing Cloud. Reporting in Braze was quite satisfactory. I wish there was a little better heat mapping when reporting on emails, just a better understanding of where people are clicking. Other than that, reporting in Braze was adequate. For how long have I used the solution? I have been working in this field for around eight years now. How are customer service and support? The transition was fairly easy, as setting everything up in Braze felt like a more modern tool than Salesforce Marketing Cloud. IP warming was straightforward, and the Braze customer account manager really helped us and walked us through everything. Braze has excellent documentation, which also helped. What other advice do I have? Regarding Braze's AI capabilities, I have not tested this feature too extensively, and I have not seen any concerning issues. Regarding Braze's AI capabilities, I am somewhat skeptical, but I have seen some positives in using it, such as being able to use AI to determine when people are clicking or opening emails at the best time and using that as a send time indicator, thus having that level of personalization. The advice I would give to others looking into using Braze is to definitely ask about all the features because there are many, and definitely use the account managers that you receive. I would rate Braze an eight out of ten overall. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Private Cloud If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use? Other
What is our primary use case? My main use case for Braze is sending all of our push notifications, emails, and content cards. I also use Braze for reporting, optimizing, and building our emails using their custom drag and drop email editor, which doesn't require any HTML experience. Regarding how I use Braze, I really appreciate their Canvas feature. You can use a bunch of different channels to achieve one goal, and it all is very easy to use and buildable as a marketer without the need of a developer. How has it helped my organization? Braze has positively impacted my organization with the ability to send all of these communications across multiple games. This autonomy has impacted productivity and team workload by allowing us to move quickly. What is most valuable? The best features Braze offers include Canvas, which is probably the best one. I also really appreciate their drag and drop editor, given we're a small team and I need to be able to build independently. Regarding features including reporting and analytics, I mainly use the campaign report. Once the campaign or the piece of content has gone out, there's a page where you can see analytics right there without really needing to do anything. Braze has positively impacted my organization with the ability to send all of these communications across multiple games. What needs improvement? Braze can be improved, but honestly, I feel it's a pretty perfect tool. I have done discovery calls with a bunch of different CRM platforms and found Braze to be the most complete and the one that feels the most intuitive to use as a nontechnical person. I think it's an expensive tool, so from a business standpoint, a lot of people might not be able to justify the cost given how expensive it is. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Braze since twenty sixteen across four different companies. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Braze is stable. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Braze's scalability is impressive. If you are a small company, you can use Braze. If you are a large company, you can use Braze. They have different tiers in terms of customer support. How are customer service and support? I would rate the customer support on a scale of one to ten as phenomenal. I feel it's one of the best parts of Braze. They are very knowledgeable. I have always had very good customer support representatives. Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? I have not previously used a different solution; I have always used Braze. I was hired at this company to be the expert on Braze, and across the four companies that I worked in my career, we have always used Braze. What was our ROI? I have seen a return on investment, but it's hard to say an exact return. There are definitely fewer employees needed. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Braze is that pricing is expensive. You get a dedicated onboarding team, and they assist you with everything that you might need. Which other solutions did I evaluate? My organization evaluated other options before choosing Braze and did discovery calls for Leanplum, Sailthru, Iterable, and I think Customer.io. What other advice do I have? I'd rate it a 9 (docking a point because of the high price). The advice I would give to others looking into using Braze is that I love Braze, and I'm a huge supporter of using it. I think it has made my life as a marketer a lot easier. I would rate this review a nine out of ten. If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use? Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Although I fairly new to using it, I'm excited to better streamline my work and feel confident in the canvas flow created. Im often unsure if I've used the best metrics and if I've made an efficient audience. This will take alot of the guess work out of it. Nothing really. Since my knowledge is limited I do find all the wording overwhelming. But I appreciate the breakdowns so I can learn and follow. This has helped me reduce manual testing and decision-making by automatically optimising