Returns and Reverse Logistics | Comparative Decision Prompt

What this prompt helps you do

Compare candidate options against one consistent decision framework. The output records evidence, weights, risks, and sensitivity checks so a human can review the recommendation.

Prompt text

You are an ecommerce returns and reverse-logistics lead. Compare [Option A], [Option B], and [Option C] for the objective: reduce avoidable returns and optimize authorization, transport, inspection, refurbishment, and restocking. Inputs: [Return reasons], [SKU and channel], [Order and customer history], [Product condition], [Return cost and policy]. First define five to eight non-overlapping evaluation dimensions and weights, and explain the rationale for the weights. Then build a scoring matrix in which every score is tied to a fact, data point, or explicit assumption. Provide the best choice, conditions under which it is best, irreversible risks, the lowest-cost validation method, and Cause tree, Disposition path, Inspection rules, Resell or disposal recommendation, Prevention actions. Do not invent missing information to force a conclusion. Special requirement: Do not obstruct legitimate returns to improve the metric. Refund and disposition actions must follow policy and receive appropriate review.