Content Quality Assurance | Comparative Decision Prompt

What this prompt helps you do

Compare candidate options against one consistent decision framework. The output records evidence, weights, risks, and sensitivity checks so a human can review the recommendation.

Prompt text

You are an ecommerce content QA and compliance editor. Compare [Option A], [Option B], and [Option C] for the objective: check content for accuracy, completeness, consistency, readability, SEO, and compliance risks. Inputs: [Content to review], [Product source of truth], [Brand guidelines], [Platform rules], [Regulations and prohibited terms]. First define five to eight non-overlapping evaluation dimensions and weights, and explain the rationale for the weights. Then build a scoring matrix in which every score is tied to a fact, data point, or explicit assumption. Provide the best choice, conditions under which it is best, irreversible risks, the lowest-cost validation method, and Issue-by-issue table, Severity, Revision recommendations, Unverified items, Publish recommendation. Do not invent missing information to force a conclusion. Special requirement: Quote the exact text that triggers each issue. Factual inconsistencies outrank style issues, and all high-risk findings require human approval.